four in a bed – summer 2020

A new series of episodes of channel 4’s four in a bed started airing in June 2020.

Format the same and boasting and game playing all rather evident.

Series Set beginning 15th June 2020 saw over confident extremely picky Graham and Karen Smith’s Tigh Na Leigh guest house in Alyth, Perth and Kinross as very controversial winners. The payment day of this episode set was very tense and uncomfortable viewing and the guests agreed not to be present for the crowning of the weeks winners.

It has since been reported that Tigh Na Leigh’s listings on Tripadvisor were suspended due to adversely negative postings since the episode aired. It looks like Tripadvisor have removed the postings and allowed postings once more.

Interestingly it seems Channel 4 have removed this episode set from their episode listings.

I have no idea why the couple went on the show and they must fully regret how they have come across.

Series Set beginning 22nd June 2020 saw Jockhedge Holiday Cottages the winners. My view was that other than Pete Lacey of Beach House in Portland in Dorset the others just did not come across as genuine. The two ex teachers Aidan and Mij that ran Earlston House Hotel in Paignton, Devon were noticeably sure they would win.

Series Set beginning 29th June 2020 saw Rich Norris of the Cliff House Hotel in Southbourne as winners of the week. Once again the week was controversial as Hannah Henewaa and Ibrahim Sani of the Montpellier Hotel in Llandrindod Wells, Powys played the game and underpaid all 3 other couples by a considerable amount pretty much saying the rooms were over priced compared to their budget hotel. For me Paul Wright and Dave McDermott’s Coach and Horses in Compton West Sussex probably should have won.

Tripadvisor have been busy again with removing negative reviews of the the Montpellier Hotel that appeared as soon as the payment day episode appeared.

four in a bed

At the start of the covid-19 lockdown and bored on a Saturday afternoon i happened upon four in a bed on channel 4 catch up link

I had obviously heard about it from before and had as it transpired eaten in one of the pubs featured as a b&b late last year.

The format as you no doubt know is 4 sets of b&b owners visit each others accommodation , critique, score and pay what they believe a nights stay to be worth with the winner of that week getting a plaque.

Each visit and first 4 episodes of a set follow the same format ,

i) the 3 other guests arrive are shown their room for the night,

ii) they then examine the room for cleanliness and in some cases this means pulling the mattress off the bed, checking behind the radiator, or on top of the wardrobe etc etc looking for minuscule amounts of dust.

iii) they do an activity in the area that the owner has chosen, i guess this is to break the ice and pad the episode out some

iv) go out for an evening meal either at somewhere close by or at the owners property

v) sleep

vi) have breakfast the next morning

vii) the 3 sets of guests fill in a critique form for things such as how were your hosts, cleanliness, breakfast, facilities all marked with a score out of 10 and whether they would return given the choice and put in an envelope a payment to cover what they thought the stay was worth

vii) guests leave and owner reads the critique and more often than not they can identify the guest by the feedback

The last episode of the week (episode 5) has all participants meet and they can quiz the others on the critique given and they discover how much each guest has paid. The winner of the week is determined by overall percentage of payment compared to cost of room. It is possible that a guest may pay more than the room rate though this is rare.

In reality easy background viewing. Having watched for a few Saturdays and dipping into the catch up archives I have drawn the following conclusions

The 4 establishments for a week can be very varied from a glamping site, to a small b&b, to a small hotel, to a more luxury guesthouse/hotel.

The guests can vary from being owners of their establishment, to being workers or managers in their establishment. In the main most guests go as a couple though that could be with a friend who has no day to day input into the running of the establishment they are representing or they go on their own.

I’m not necessarily sure the varying accommodation types work other than to create talking points/confrontations.

Examples being

i) glamping sites where there is not a private bathroom and the guests are to cook their own breakfast. More often than not one of the guests has no interest in this type of accommodation and will heavily under pay or critique. in general they would not be the sort of guests who would ordinarily be marketed to for this type of accommodation

ii) establishments that have onsite parking verses ones in middle of towns ie blackpool where parking is not outside and quite often an additional charge. again you would know this before you booked and would understand

iii) establishments who charge extra for breakfast be that any type or cooked against others that include it in the room rate. it seems owners of the latter more often criticise and markdown this. Some people don’t necessarily want breakfast so in the latter case are paying for something they dont want

iv) difference in pricing. often their is a critique that a room is too expensive or even too cheap compared to their own establishment, but i’m not sure that the person has critiqued has studied the area and market demand for similar establishments.

There appears to be a varying set of points that I call gates to critique or argue about ie

i) breakfast food gate, be that be sausage, egg. comparisons on sausage thickness, egg yolk colour, firmness or not so firm, use or lack of local produce

ii) boast gate i.e. i have been a professional chef or have run an establishment for 30 years, i pride myself on cleanliness. More often than not these people fall foul of their own boasts.

iii) people who critique others and then fail on the same point at theirs be that dust in the room.

iv) dont believe gate, again cleanliness is an example where the owner is convinced there was nothing wrong when they quadruple checked the room

v) extreme game play/pettiness

With regards to pettiness/game play some people set out to just find fault be that from the start or to get back at a guest who had perhaps correctly marked down their establishment previously.

Again as part of viewing I guess that allowing a guest to see the critique of others prior to visiting their establishment can cause tit for tat. It would be interesting to see how a different order to visits would have played out.

Some guests just don’t do confrontation so perhaps can be classified as game playing by never critiquing others for failings.

I don’t understand why some owners who have staff to say cook breakfast or operate front of house take this task on during their establishment being visited as to me its not a true reflection of their place. Owners know when the others are coming so how in reality is their establishment i.e. elaborate continental breakfast offerings, cleanliness etc though you do have to question those that don’t fix glaring issues prior to the visit.

What do the owners get from going on the show, obviously free publicity, that can be repeated a number of times due to show repeats. Though there must be a negative impact on overly critical people or establishments that don’t show themselves in a good light. Looking at the internet I can find examples of where their appearance has caused backlash i.e. a b&b owner in blackpool who criticised cheaper establishments in the area having windows smashed soon after the show airing, a young guy and his partner from essex who refused to stay in a glamping site reporting they have been subjected to trolling and abuse that may have damaged his business.

Its surprising well i guess not that looking at trip advisor for others reviews of establishments featured that people will actually write a review after watching the show and have not even visited. Just shows that little moderating happens on trip advisor and either the owners of the establishment dont check the reviews or cant flag them for removal.

For owners currently featuring you would think they would get their online platforms in order be that a blog/news that is updated, a twitter or instagram presence that is updated or current. Its possible for some newly taken over establishments that they did not get full ownership of all social channels.

Some owners post they are due to feature, or show they have won, others don’t mention it at all.

Some establishments no longer exist or are owned by others but this is not made clear on the repeat showings.

It must be a tough time due to covid-19 for these establishments and it will be interesting to see how they come out of it. I have been checking the social/website updates of featured establishments from the last few saturdays and from dipping in to the last few aired series on catch up. Some establishments have just gone quiet since March, others have posted they hope to open say May, June and then gone quiet. Some such as pub b&b’s have tried to operate food / drink takeaways. There is limited information as to refund policies though perhaps some of that may depend on how they took bookings be that direct or via a booking site.

not fiction enough

whilst reading the latest Peter Robinson Inspector Banks novel “When the music’s over” brought to mind an article I had read in the daily mail a few weeks back concerning the crime novelist Peter James’s Roy Grace novel “Want You Dead”. The article see here discusses the concern of a victim of a heinous crime that the James novels plot fully explores her ordeal and there are concerns that the police force that dealt with her case had provided too much insight into her case. It is no secret that James has connections with Sussex Police as he acknowledges the support of various current and former  members of the force he also acknowledges he has based Roy Grace on a former Detective Chief Superintendent .

Robinson’s latest Inspector Banks novel has two stories. These stories draw heavily from the very recent public cases surrounding historic celebrity abuse and of child exploitation think savil and rotherham. Both stories actually mention the stories in context. Robinson does not tend to acknowledge sources for his work though this books does acknowledge works by others as his reference.

James has written since 2005 to date 12 novels surrounding his character Roy Grace the books have been published yearly without break. Robinson has written since 1987 24 novels surrounding Inspector Banks with the odd year or so of breaks. It must be very difficult to come up with unique ideas for each book that can be researched and written within set timescales for a yearly release given that today authors are expected to travel the country and world promoting their novels and quite often are producing a second unrelated book or advising on television adaptation during that year. It there therefore little wonder that they draw their ideas from real life events. The question is how far should the story follow fully the real life event. One has to sympathize with the victims of crime that recognize fully/partially their story in fiction. Unlike television no warnings are provided upfront about content or help organisations are mentioned at any point if you have been affected.

James in the main sets his Roy Grace novels in Sussex specifically Brighton whilst Robinson in the main sets his Inspector Banks novels in Yorkshire though Eastvale is his own creation modeled on Ripon and Richmond.

Robinson often mentions the local  Black Sheep brewery plus various music album and artist references . James mentions actual hotel and businesses within the sussex area. This must be a good source of advertising for the companies mentioned.

 

married at first sight season 2 episode 5

so the honeymoons are over and the couples arrive back in London to live together for a month before deciding whether to stay together or go their separate ways

 

Clark and Melissa

The youngest couple. Interestingly Melissa after the experiment ends has a job in Northamptonshire so Clark will have to decide whether to stay in London or also leave. Could be a deal breaker as it would be a big step to give up everything but if not then they will be apart for a long period of the week or he would commute. For the first time he admits to his best man he is having doubts and in different circumstances would have as he put it jumped ship

As expected they decided on decision day to stay married.

 

 

Adam and Sara

The most compatible couple according to the experts. Adam admits they have differences but the positives outweigh the negatives he is very laid back to Sara’s cautious approach

They seem to struggle to get on he seems quire aloof with her I think he wants out but won’t do it

Its quite strange really as the program flashes to them on a train holding hands.

Towards the end of the experiment they head to Ibiza. Seems like they are maybe escaping reality and not deciding things at the end in a real world scenario.

On decision day they sit in front of two of the expects and are actually holding hands. Incredibly they have decided to stay together which for the viewer was probably que unexpected

 

Adam and Caroline

Initial impressions are they were very into each other when they moved into the rented flat they would share for the 4 weeks. Not much has been said of whether Adam would move from his home in Bournemouth if they stay together and he does own his property there. He takes her to visit. She does seem a little shocked about his property being full of super hero memorabilia esp. the bedspread. Caroline is intent on staying in London. She is very strong willed and I suspect she expects that she will get her way.

They have issues with where to live as she is keen on staying in London he could change his job to Reading but due to shifts he could still not live in London, she would need to compromise and perhaps live in Reading ad commute in. He does come across as devastated that he is letting her down as he so wants it to work.

On decision day they cuddle up in front of the experts as they make their decision. Even though logistics are an issue they have decided to stay together as was expected

 

 

 

 

Steve and Lucie

Both had never lived with anyone before they will share a place in East London. Steve has not managed to stop smoking as he promised.

Poor Steve got the Spanish inquisition from Lucie’s father on a weekend visiting him he seems quite timid as it is.

Steve comes across as very indecisive Lucie is more into him than him into her though he might just be doubtful

On decision day even the experts were unsure of what their decision would be. Lucie obviously wants to stay together she admits they are different in front of the experts but have decided to stay married though they will live apart.

 

The next catchup is a couple of weeks later.

Adam and Caroline are living apart as Adam has not got a work transfer as yet

Sara moved into Adam’s accommodation

Lark and Melissa have moved to Milton Keynes

Lucie and Steve split he explained Lucie felt they were friends

 

After five months

Steve and Lucie are friends

Adam and Sara split after a month

Clark and Melissa have decided to live apart and see what happens it does not seem hopeful

Caroline and Adam have stayed together and are living in London

So as per the first series the experiment has not really worked though Caroline and Adam do appear to have a chance and have worked through their difficulties. At the end of the program Channel 4 mentioned applying for the next series.

None of the experts commented at the end of the program re the outcome of the 3 couples who have split.